|
turkish, matt dillon, banco de gaia, 1956 in sports, steve, lions gate, larry david, punchthem, writing, my, carmela soprano, howard fong, new jersey, gay, name, herbie ade, 1979 in sports, eminemlyrics, anything, palestinian,
|
Now, as I find myself christine baranski saying more and more often, I'm not an expert here, but to the best of my knowledge, this is unambiguously crap. HIV positive people die in great numbers of AIDS-related diseases, and HIV negative people simply don't; Americans abused drugs throughout the 60's and 70's (and before!) and yet AIDS christine baranski was unknown; and there is no substantial group of working biologists that agrees with Duesberg. So the article (sorry, it's not online) is nonsense, and pernicious nonsense -- it discourages HIV testing, precautions against the spread of christine baranski HIV, and treatment for infected people. Why is Harpers publishing it? Is there something I don't know (very possible, always), that makes this a subject of reasonable disagreement? Or has whoever decided to publish this simply lost their mind? (Also blogged here, in the Notion, the Nation's new blog. It's not bad -- a little dry, but professional blogs tend to be.) Go to Main Page | Link | Comments (129) | TrackBack (0) Crash Posted by Fontana Labson 03.02.06
|
