 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| artists, disco, viagrajokes, wordssong lyrics 50 cent that's what's up feat_ g unit guess who's back?, news, suzanne shepherd, listof films, matt dillon, pauline lynch, humor magazine, televison, sean stone, robert carlyle, evil thatcher, | Is freedom so holy to them that they scaled the feeling of 1,000,000,000 Muslims worldwide? For what reason? When they protect such a "book" whose manner of expression is so vulgar, it makes a mockery of freedom. It is another misuse of the slogan freedom, with a profound awareness that this is not the only warning time that the word, "FREEDOM", has been abused. Sections of the Above text taken from the Introduction of "Let The Bible Speak" by ABDUL RAHMAN DIMASHKIAH. "The Satanic Verses unexpurgated" by warning Ahmad Deedat [Islam Under Assault] [Mainpage] [What's warning New?] Mother, May I Sleep with Treacher? yeah, okay March 18, 2006 Stupid, cheap, and offensive Posted by Jim Treacher at 09:36 AM March 13, 2006 MILV: Mom I'd Like to Veil BUSH LIED, CINDY ATE FOOD THAT WAS FRIED Posted by Jim Treacher at 06:12 AM March 11, 2006 Tom Wolfe is unfamiliar with the horror genre From the OpJo: A reporter for the New York Times called [Wolfe] up to ask why George W. |
Best Mature Paysites
|
| Britain, defender of freedom rushed headlong to support and defend this man using as a pretext, the necessity of freedom of expression, which is in this case, the freedom of revile and curse. Even in the west news no one has a right to shout fire in a crowded hall and escape the punishment for causing a possibly fatal panic. Yet news one month before the publication of Rushdie's book, the partisans of free speech violated freedom of expression when they banned the book, SPY news CATCHER by Peter Wright. This inconsistency makes it clear that their freedom is to do as they desire, not as people of other religions earnestly request. And I wonder if we were to complain to the British Judges against a person who falsely accused me of being adulterer, what then their judgment will be?!! Would they defend him and justify his right to slander? And if not, why do they use a deviant standard of justice concerning Rushdie's book which reviled those who are a model to Muslims around the world. |
|
Looking for real sex? Find someone now on the
largest sex personals network.FREE signup! Post a FREE erotic ad w/5 photos, flirt in chatrooms, view explicit live Webcams, meet for REAL sex! 30,000 new photos every day! Find SEX now 
|
